- What were the problems quoted against LIC at a macro level? The committee blamed the industry players for not spreading insurance to the nook-and-corner of this vast country. Percapita Insurance coverage was low. Total premium in the life industry was less than 2% of GDP for decades. Policy holders were taken for granted and extended poor service when they visited offices of the public sector companies.
- What were the good things that went un-noticed? First, Its claim settlement ratio was always more than 95% and one of the best in the world. LIC employees were chansing claimants for submission of pending requirements. Second, For its size, it was corrpution free (still is!). Third, Employees, though frustrated, were intelligent. Fourth, it had a large rural presence.
Already there is a talk of consolidation in the industry (read as Mergers and Acquisitions). An interesting thought could be "Will LIC look at Acquisition as one of its choices to gain its lost share of HNI customers?"
Now the private players have reached a stage where they have to take stock of the situation and change their strategy. I would like to analyze the following in my blogs:
- What needs to be done?
- Who should do it?
- How it may be approached?
